103 total views, 1 views today
Based on the documentary – The UN Deception – made by John Birch Society. Part 2
NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS – NGO’S
In order to pave the way for national governments to surrender any political power to the UN, the globalists needs to create the appearance of popular support for their plans. For several decades the UN has organised non- governmental organisatons (NGO’s). The NGO’s must appear to be spontaneous with no connection with CFR/UN. The desired delusion is that the public demanding change. The NGO’s drives the UN agenda forward.
The UN demonizes the widespread of weapons availabiltity as the cause of tragedy and death. UN have propaganda films that says that the citizens would be safer if they let the government to take away the weapons to defend themselves. Generating pressure from below, the NGO networks also plays a critical role in the push for civilian disarmament. IANSA is a network of these NGO’s created by CFR.
William Norman Grigg editor of the newspaper New American says:
” IANSA was not created as a spontaneous outporing from global civil society as the United Nations would insist. It is entirley a creation of the United Nations in collaboration with taxattempt foundations and socialist governments in Europe.”
USING ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AS AN EXCUSE
Revolutionary strategics has long recognized that a crisis can facilitate a major change in political arrengements. Amongst the useful crisis, war or the threat of war has always topped their list. The threat of environmental catastrophy is still another crisis being used to persuade americans to accept a revolution in world political arrangements.
Even thougth many americans has serious concerns about the environment such genuin concern in not motivated by the UN/CFR elite. Their objection is power. They have no interest in solving environmental problems as that would defeat their objective by removing the need of political change. More and more americans are being told that global problems require global solutions. Global solutions meaning UN power.
History shows that giving more power to government is exactly the opposite that what those concerned about the environment should champion.
William Norman Grigg:
”It seems to me that people that who is genuinely concerned about environmental protections should understand that the last thing that we want is to turn over total power to a political elite that can despoil the environment without sanction”.
By contrast the best contractor of environment is private property owners simpbly because of they have a vested interest.
UNITED NATIONS AND AGENDA 21
Convened under the pretext of saving planet earth from environmental destruction, the 1992 UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro was a major watershed event for the globalist agenda. The summit put governments noticed that major changes was needed in economic agendas and in our institutions of governence. The earth summit gathering was designed to give the illusion of planetary democracy at work while the NGO’s lobbied outside for tougher measures. In fact the principal program of the summit had long in advance been worked out by the CFR. In supporting the illusion of democracy at work UN propagandafilms showed the NGO’s at Rio as independent voice representing the crossection of civil society.
Author William F. Jasper:
”The massive ang growing NGO-contingent at the United Nations has become a global mob.and if you look at who is actually funding them it becomes apparent. They are there to make the globalists more conservative and at the same time give the appareance that they are representing the people of the world, the people of the civil society. ”
In many UN conferences there are representatives of the indigenous people. UN gives the impression that these actvists represents the genuin independent voice of their people.
Author William F. Jasper:
”On all UN summits you will see so called representives of indigneous people. They are there repeting the phrases that has been fashioned for them by the same NGO-leaders who are promoting the UN-line. ”
The CFR-inspired program that came out of Rio was Agenda 21. A massive enviromentalist manifesto. A summary notes:
”Effective execution of agenda 21 will require profound reorientation of all human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments adn individuals. There are specific actions that are intended to be undertaken by every person on earth. ”
ICC – A PRIVATE GLOBAL COURT
For several decades the globalists developed the idea of a permanent international criminal court with the power to try individuals. At the dawn of the 21st century the UN annonces specific plans to implement such a court.
The CFR was pulling the strings behind ICC – International Criminal Court. In 1998 the UN convened a conference in Rome and creating a treaty that would establish the court. The ICC would be a venue to try tyrants and other internations threat to peace.
In Rome a NGO-publication reminded attednies at the conference where world justice was needed most. The primary target for the delegates and the NGO was the USA.
Author William F. Jasper:
”The ICC summit turned into a huge bash america feast. Each day the official delegates listened to speakers and NGO-reps talking about U.S. vialation of human rights and of social unjustice. They said that they wanted to use ICC to try U.S. citizens and U.S. officials for these told crimes. ”
The message was: America is the source of evil of the world.
A treaty was signed for ICC in Rome. Professor Charles Rice. examined the proposal of the ICC:
”in our systems lawyers are supposed to be a rule of reason which in a sense control the state and the state should operate under law. Under the ICC- proposal that wouldn’t happen. Claiming jurisdiction to try americans for actions committed in the United States for social unjustice, crime against humanity, that is a repeal of the declaration of independence. This is outrageous. ”
The Rometreaty claim ICC to try any individual charged with genocide, warcrimes, crimes against humanity and agression. No concensus was reached under this conference of a definiton of this crimes. That would be left to arbitrary interpretations of the ICC-judges. Prosecuters and counsils can be drawn forn authoritarian regimes that are resentful of ameicans. The ICC will recognize no right to a trial by jury certainly no right to a speedy trial. An american citizen, whether in or out the U.S., could be accused of violating an undefined UN law. He would then be prosecuted by foreing prosecuters and judges. Then sent to some undisclosed prison somewhere in the world.
”Most important, we must sign and ratify the treaty for a permanent internations criminal court”.
The Clintonadministration initially objected and refuse to sign the ICC-treaty. Other political leaders show similar protest. Why some of this resistance was genuin much if it follow a familiar pattern. Many politician will often conceal their support for radical proposals by putting on an initial show of opposition. Eventually these politicians reverse themselves at a strategic moment. Saying that a compromise has been achieved and the public is led to believe that its interests has been protected. Eventually the Rometreaty was signed by Bill Clinton shortly before he left office.
WORLD GOVERNMENT = TOTAL CONTROL
If a UN-controlled world government is achieved, americans can expect their life to change dramatically. Resistance to the UN would be impossible and America would be incapable to defending itselfes from an emerging totalitarian order. For example, population control would go into effect in America. This control includes mandatory abortion. To eliminate surplus population, euthanasia and assited suicide would be promoted. Private and homeschool would be outlawed since UN takes control over all facets of education. Global taxes will be implemented on the americans in addition to federal and state taxes.
To transform much of the U.S: land to wildlife habitates millions of americans will be relocated and roads will be declared off limits. The very rihgt to own property will be restricted and eventually abolished all together. All law enforcement officers will fall under control under a global UN police force. Local police would serve and protect the state and the entire U.S: military would fall under the commamd of the UN and UN peace keepers. Their prime objecvite: to supress any opposition against the United Nations. If the plan for a UN controlled world government continues, the americans will discover that their constitutional rights will be gone. and resistance to the UN will be impossible. And that the once mighty America won’t be able to defend herselves against an emerging totalitarian order.
LEAVING THE UNITED NATIONS
USA membership withdrawal from UN could start UN to wither and die. House of representatives has the power to kill U.S. membership. A majority of 218 vote could effectively get U.S: out of the UN.
Tom Gow from John Birch Society:
”Congressman are focusing on jobsecurity and getting re-elcted. The founding fathers intended it that way when they set up the House of Representives to be responsive to the american people. And the internationalists know that and thats why they been spending so much time to influence via masscommunication so that they can influence public opinion. And its very difficult for the congressman to fight that influence from the news”.