CODEX ALIMENTARIUS – THE CRIMINALIZATION OF NUTRIENTS (PART TWO)

1 total views, 1 views today

April 2017

 

CODEX ALIMENTARIUS MANDATORY IN WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION

Little you and little me are not served by codex in the least. So before we go forward and talk and talk about the rest of what has to happen, let’s ask codex Alimentarius does. You probably all know about the vitamin and mineral gudieline that was ratified on july 4th. You may not know that although it is sais that codex guidelines, regulations and standards which have been ratified are voluntary. They are not voluntary. That is known as a lie. They are mandatory but they are not fully mandatory until december 31:st 2009. They sort of kind of a little bit mandatory now and they’re totally mandatory then. So what does codex Alimentarius do? Why do I care enough about codex to close my practice and stop treating patients who came to me from around the world to help them regain their health and be radiantly well with non-toxic means. Lets talk about hte vitamin and mineral guideline first. In 1994 here in the United States DESHA – the dietary end Supplements Health and Education act was passed. The act classifies nutrions and herbs as foods. As foods you can set no upper iimit on them. You cannot set an upper limit on lettuce, lamb, or rutabagas. And similarly, yo cannot set an uppr limit on vitamin C, echinacea, ginkgo biloba, Vitamin D. And access to nutrients is freely given to us.We are allowed to have any nutrients we want. Under common law, anything not forbidden is permitted. Codex Alimentarius on the other is a Napoleonic code law system. Under Napoleonic code, anything not permitted is forbidden.

CODEX WILL DESTROY DESHA

In 1994 we passed DESHA. Nutriens and foods, we can have as much of themas we want, it’s our business. In 1994 Codex Alimentarius, with no noteice hre in the United States, declared nutrients to be toxins, poisions. Dangerous industrial poisons. As poisons, we have to be protected from them.How do you protect somebody from a poisn? You use toxicology. You use a science called risk assessment. Risk assessment is that first you take the substance that’s poisonous and you feed it to animals and you determine the dose that kills fifty percent. That’s called the ld50. And you extrapolate what the ld50 for a human being might be. Then you go down to the other end ot hte dosage range and you start feeding tiny bits of it to tst animal. And you come up with the largest possible dose, the maximun permissible upper limit that can be fed to an animal before a discernible impact is shown. Then you divide that by a hundred. That’s how they do it in risk assessment. And now you got a safety margin. So yu got one one-hundreth of the largest dose that can be given with no discernible iimpact. Nutriens under Codex Alimentarius, not only are limited to those nutrients ion the positive list. And we anticipate there will be 18 of them. And they do not include kokuten, glucosamine, chondoctrin sulfate . They do include fluoride. Which to my knowledge as a pshysician has absolutely no biological benefit whatsoever. But fluoride does make people complacement. Fluoride was first used in the Gulag. Because it was discovered that prisoners who were fed fluoridated water, were complacent. And you could do anything yuu wanted to them. They were easy to manage. So you have 18 nutrients, you have little doses that are determined scientifically to have no effect on any human being. In this country we have a problem.We have DESHA, we got to get rid of DESHA in order to harmonize with Codex Alimentarius.

 

CRIMINALIZATION OF VITAMIN AND MINERALS

So how do we get rid of DESHA? We attack it legislatively of course. And there are five bills currently before congress, designed to overturn GATT, invalidate and otherwise get rid of DESHA. Once DESHA is gone we can harmonize with the vitamin-and mineral guideline. So what we’re taling about is waking up one morning and be very surprised to find that high potency therapeutically, effective, ckinically nutrients are now illegal, in the way that heroin is illegal. Not available with a description – illegal. If these nutrients have any impact on the human body, they are illegal. That’s just hte vitamin-and minerla guideline. Lets’s talk about milk. We have  recombinant bovine growth hormone. And now we can choose milk wirth it or milk without it. Butter with it or butter without it. But not under codex. Because under codex, every dairy cow on the planet, must be treated with Monsantos recombinant bovine growth hormone. Furthermore, under codex, every animal used for food on thsi planet, whether it has fins,feet or feathers, every animal on the planet must be treated with subclinical antibiotics, must be treated with exogenous growth hormones. Codex requires mandates that all food be irradiated unless it’s eatenlocally and raw. Including organic food of course. is it organic afterwards?Well of course the organic standards are incredibly low. The organic standars allow a farmer to use veterinary, including growth hormones, antibiotics on animals. And then athis whim reclassify them as organic. But farmers are our friends and they would never do that right?

 

3 BILLION DEATHS BY CODEX

Codex sets limits for the dangerous industrial chemicals that you can have in your food. And the limits are incredibly higg. Go to codex alimentarius and look in the dorpdown menus at the top of the official codex page. Look at the toxins and the veterinary chemicals and the levels that are set. They are terrifying. The names of the chemiclas that are permitted and the amounts of the chemicals that are permitted are terrifying. In 2001 ther were 176 countries incuding U.S.got together and they said there are 12 really bad organic chemicals. They’re called POPS – Persistent Organic Pollutants. There are a lo of them but ther are 12 that are sobad that nobody could disagree that those 12 pops had to be banned wolrdwide. Nine of the 12 worst organic chemcials known are pesticides. And of course we have many processes and enzyme systems that are very much like insects and other pests so they’re not to good for us. Bud Codex Alimaentarius has brought back seven of the nine forbidden pops. Dieldrin, Eldren, hexachlorabenzene. And the food that is imported from other countries that contains these substances cannot be stopped at our borders. Because otherwise it would be a trade violation. That’s how Codex Alimaentarius works. Codex, according to the World Trade Organisation and the Food and Agriculture Organisation joint projections. If you do the numbers in the WTO and FTO projections,they estimate that just the vitamin-and mineral guideline alone, when it goes into global implementation will result in a minimum of 3 billion deaths. One millimn tthrough simple starvation. those folks who dies are not particularly economically successful from the point of view of the corporations. The next two billions , they will die from the preventable sideases of undernutrition, cancer (the single most profitable condition evernown to human kind), cardiovascular disease – a good secong, diabetes. And a whole host of other preventable diseases who will die= Who knows?Whi will live ? Probably those people who are wealthy enough and powerful enough to have their own pushers of clean food and nutrients. You and I? probably not. Our children? probably not.

 

BILL CLINTON AND FAST TRACK TO WTO

So we’re talking about food regualtions that are in fact the legalization of mandated toxicity and undernutrition. It will be illegal, it there’s a famine somewhere, to ship high nutrient density biscuits to that country. And it will be illegal to distribute them. Codex is big and it’s bad. But it’s not invulneralbe. So the point is that we have to protect ourselves and I believe that we have to regain global leadership which we have lost. Just joining the WTO surrendeerd our sovereignty. However I have a team of constitutional lawyers looking at the following question: are we members of the WTO? Because the way you get a treaty to be a real treaty is to have it ratified by a two-thirds majority of the Senate. And the way we got inte the World Trade organisation was they passed a law allowing Bill Clinton to fast-tack us inte the World Trade organisation. That’s not a treaty.
Picture in your mind a wasp or a bee-trap. Where the insect voluntarily goes down the funnel and then can’t get up out of the trap. That’s codex. A regular law can be overturned, it can repealed, it can be corrected by another opiece of legislation. But once we becom ecodex compliant in any area as long asd we are membersof the World Trade organisation it can never be repealed. Because we have lost the sovereignty to become un-codex compliant as long as we are in the World Trade Organisation. So it’s very important that we make sure that we don’t become codex compliant. Every country in the wolrdl has to be codex compliant in order not to get hit by the World Trade organsations sanctions, if they’re members. What does codex compliance mean? What it measn is that the format, the issues and the subjects covered by codex guideline standards or regulation have to be addressed in the countries guideline standard or regulation on the same topic. What we have done is create the first of many alternative codex guidelines. It’s a legal challenge to the polciy of the U.S. government on codex.

Share

Kommentera